Skip to content

Observation Point Posts

Perhaps Humanity’s Most Dangerous Idea

If I asked you what you thought was humanity’s most dangerous idea, I wonder what you would choose.

Splitting the atom? Perhaps Religion?

For me, it’s this. That the end justifies the means.

Let’s just look around and see where that idea has taken us.

A drone strike killed a dozen innocent civilians, but also killed a senior ISIS figure. The end justified the means.

The US Republican Party back a moral degenerate and liar to be president. And when he becomes president and, no surprise, said moral degenerate, aka Donald Trump, engages in massive obstruction of justice, while using the presidency to increase his personal wealth, the party does nothing.

When Trump is finally impeached, they protect him, despite massive and clear evidence of guilt.

But Trump helps the GOP retain the dregs of its dwindling power. The end justified the means.

Here in Australia, The LNP ignore science along with masses of incontrovertible evidence that Global Warming is a clear and present crisis, because they sense that enough ill informed conservatives will get them over the election line. The end justified the means.

We, each one of us, live with a cruel policy that locks up refugees for years, driving many of them to insanity or even suicide, but it… wait for it… Stops the Boats. The end justified the means.

In Burma, the military commit genocide to get rid of the Rohingya people. But it makes land available for ethnic Burmese people, so… the end justified the means.

All over the world, religious institutions systematically sacrifice children to pedophiles, in order to protect the image of said institutions.

It always begins small. A bishop moves a priest who’s improperly touched a child to a new parish. It was only a small thing, and he promised he’d never do it again.

Suddenly there are a hundred little ones who’s lives have been savagely scarred. The end justified the means.

And once that idea takes hold, that the end justifies the means, then eventually any deed, no matter how evil can be defended, simply by presenting it as the only way to achieve some deeply desired objective.

But who decides how much pain and suffering caused by the means is justified by the nirvana to be had from the ends?

It turns out, that decision is only ever made by those who benefit most from the ends.

Those who pay the price?

Well, they never have a say.

Leave a Comment

Is Australia a Democracy?

At first glance, one might think the answer is obvious. Of course we are.

But, wait a minute. Let’s look a tad more closely.

First a definition: Democracy; a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives.

So far, so democratic.

But doesn’t that suppose all votes are equal? And what about that bit about, “all the eligible members”?

To the first point, I maintain that as long as the maximum level of campaign contributions are more than most people can afford, and as long as huge contributions to political advertising are allowed, then all votes aren’t equal. The simple reality is that Gina Rinehart’s huge contributions to political parties’ advertising campaigns give her a far more powerful say in how our nation is governed than almost every other Australians’ vote.

The same with corporations, unions and special interest groups. They, who aren’t even Australian citizens, And who, in the case of corporations may be representing foreigners, get a far more powerful say than the rest of us.

In what universe is that a democracy?

Australia is ahead of most countries in that political campaigns are to a large degree publicly funded. Yes, I know, not perfect but far better than most countries.

So, why don’t we take a huge step towards re-establishing ourselves as a democracy, by banning donations to political advertising campaigns, and banning political advertising by any entity that is not a political party running in the election?

It’s simple and it would make a massive difference.

And it would also reduce the number of those annoying ads during election campaigns.

 

 

1 Comment

What The MRRT Can Teach Us About Labor’s Loss

First. At little bit of history.

The idea of a Minerals Resources Rent Tax, (MRRT), was introduced by Kevin Rudd and became law in 2012.It was a sensible solution to a genuine problem, yet it was electorally very unpopular, was – not surprisingly – vigorously opposed by the mining industry, and was eventually dumped by the Coalition in government.Today, you’d struggle to find anyone who thinks it was a bad idea, outside of the Mining Industry, and even they’d admit it, if they were honest.

So, what was the problem back then?

During boom conditions, mining companies were making vast profits from extracting irreplaceable national resources, while the great majority of Australians were missing out on any benefits. Much of the profits went overseas, so it was a double whammy for Aussies.

You’d think it’d be a no brainer.

So, why did it fail?

I would argue, it failed because Rudd told the electorate there was a problem and offered a solution in the same breath.

This enabled the mining industry and their Coalition lackies to ignore the problem and to campaign on what was wrong with the solution; that jobs would be lost. A complete lie of course, but an effective one.

So, what could Rudd have done differently?

Well, he could have spent six months telling the electorate how it was being robbed by foreigners and corporations. This would’ve forced the companies and the then Opposition LNP  either to try to defend the indefensible, or to shut the hell up.

And you know they wouldn’t do that.

Once the electorate was suitable incensed, Rudd could’ve then offered the MRRT as a solution.

He’d have won a major victory and been hailed a hero.

So, what does this tell us about Labor’s recent loss?

Simply this.

Labor made exactly the same mistake Rudd did, but on many fronts. Shorten offered multiple problems and solutions almost in the same breath. This enabled Morrison, along with the various vested interests, to skip right over the very real problems, and either attack Labor’s solutions or present them as draconian and unnecessary.

And again, an electorate that wasn’t given time to understand and accept the NEED for change, was led to be terrified of the solutions.

Morrison never offered solutions of his own. He simply pretended the problems didn’t exist and daily attacked the solutions as having either much worse side effects that they actually did, or claimed they weren’t even necessary.

Just like it did with the MRRT, the strategy succeeded, beyond his wildest dreams.

So, in the unlikely event of any Labor strategists reading this, I implore you to learn this simple political lesson: Never, ever, offer a solution until the electorate is thoroughly convinced that the problem is genuine and that it’s being hurt by it.
In fact, here’s a simple action plan:
1. Get into power by any means you can;
2. Spend the first six months educating the electorate about the genuine problems you’ve inherited. Really spell them out, over and over again;
3. When and only when you’re certain the electorate is convinced that the problems are real and MUST be fixed, do you offer solutions;
4. Implement the solutions through the rest of the term;
5. Go to the next election with a track record of getting really good things done.

It’s not that hard, people, especially when the Coalition mostly can’t even acknowledge that the problems exist, because that would be contrary to their profoundly flawed ideology of Neoliberalsim.

But above all, do not make the same mistake a third time.

Australia can’t afford it.

Leave a Comment

What’s At the End of the Nationalism Line?

 

Globally, Nationalism appears to be digging its way out the hole we thought we’d buried it in around the turn of the century.

In the US under Trump, White Supremacy – which is the barest face of nationalism – is reappearing. Similarly, in Europe, Latin America and the Middle East, and sadly here in Australia too, it’s getting a good kick along.

A lighting ceremony held by the National Socialist Movement, a neo-Nazi group, in Georgia, 2018.CreditMark Peterson/Redux Pictures

Often by the very leaders who should be taking a stand against it.

Media pundits, in between hand wringing, talk about who or what is driving the Nationalism bus.

But I’m more concerned about where it’s heading.

Because Nationalism has only one ultimate endpoint: Violence.

There are essentially two groups of people behind the movement.

At the top are politicians and carpet baggers who see an opportunity for power, or at the very least a profile which might lead to a bucket of power or money.

The second group are the foot soldiers of nationalism.

They’re almost always the disaffected. They’ve either slipped down the ladder of success, or they’re barely clinging to the rungs.

They’re pissed off, but they have no idea at whom they should direct their offpissedness.

The first group, the Politicians and carpetbaggers, say, “It’s not your fault. You’re a victim. It’s those people over there. The ones who are a different colour, or believe in a different god. It’s their fault. But you know what? You’re better than them. They’re not quite a human as you and me.”

And then they say, “Even though you’ve had a hard time, and maybe you don’t have much, but they want what you have. And if we let them, well, they’re going to come here and take it for themselves.

They’re going to slip in on boats and outbreed us.”

Or the other message is, “Them over there, it’s all their fault. And you know what? They’ve got it all, and it should be yours. You’re better than them. You deserve it. It’s not fair that they have it all and you have none. The dirty disbelievers.”

Used to be, that was pretty much how the Nationalism sales people actually spoke. But now it’s different, more sophisticated. They’re more likely to talk about tariffs and unfair trade and “illegal boat people”..

Or maybe they’ll talk about that country over there developing a super bomb to blow us up.

Heard that one recently?

Or, they’re coming here as refugees to take over our country. Now that’s got a familiar ring to it.

Or, hey, they’re going to take over the country and impose Shariah Law.

The language might have changed to suit the times, but the message certainly hasn’t.

Thing is, there’s only one possible end point for those lines of reasoning.

Violence, and eventually, war.

So, if we hear messages like these, seductive and appealing; that make it all somebody else’s fault; that give us something to fear, that slyly gives us the idea that we as a people, are inherently better than those “others”, keep in mind, that the end of the Nationalism line, where it’s everybody off the bus whether you want to stop there or not,

Is war.

Leave a Comment

Our Election and the lessons of America

Today, Observation Point compares Australia with the US. Not to gloat, but to highlight what’s at stake in this election.

First, this very day, in any major town or city in America, you’ll l find homeless people, thousands of them, camped on the streets. Many of them are Vets; many have been driven into bankruptcy by healthcare costs.

Now, for my second point, imagine that you sit your small child down and say, “There are nasty, horrible people who want to kill you. They could appear at any time, any second. So we’re going to practice. Get under your desk, be as quiet as you can, and maybe the nasty man won’t see you and shoot you.”

And you don’t just do that once, you do it Every. Freaking. Month. Think your kids might be traumatized?

Yeah, me too!


Well, that is exactly what happens in most American schools. They call it, Active Shooter Drills.
Any of those things would horrify us in Australia. Yet they’re just the way it is in The US.

So, do they all have something in common?

They do! Its called Predatory Capitalism. not the kind of capitalism practised by businesses competing to offer better prices and service.

I’m talking about the kind of brutal, utterly unconstrained Capitalism that kills off healthy businesses for short term profit through asset stripping.

Where drug companies can systematically target the most vulnerable people in America, lie about how addictive their drugs are, make billions in profits, while literally thousands of Americans die from overdosing.

Where healthcare companies can structure plans so their profits are huge while clients die.

Where help for the needy is stripped away so taxes can be cut and profit maximised.

We might ask why Americans put up with this.

The answer is simple. They’re powerless to do anything about it. Lobbyists in Washington, funded by Predatory Capitalists, outnumber politicians about 1,200 to 1.

Those lobbyists have just one job – to maintain the status quo; to make absolutely sure things never get better for ordinary Americans.

Now the reason I’m banging on about this, aside from the sheer horror of it, is that there are powerful forces at work here whose sole aim is to make Australia just like America.

One of the most dangerous is the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA), whose goal is to get rid of all government institutions. You can read some of their objectives here

They want to drive taxes down to the point where government cannot do its most basic functions.

They are determined to remove all government controls on the economy, so that Predatory Capitalism can have its way with us, completely unimpeded.

When you choose which party to give your vote this election, please keep in mind that several ministers in the Morrison government are card carrying members of the IPA, and are dedicated to its goals.
Is this what we want for Australia?

Leave a Comment

What Drives Scott Morrison?

As the old song begins, “Here’s a story, sad but true…” – (Runaround Sue by Dion for those of you too young to remember).
Not just true, but true thousands of times, millions if we include the US.

The story matters because it shines a light on what informs and drives Scott Morrison.

Shayne grew up in a medium sized town in NSW, finished high school and went to work in a local factory, the largest employer in the district.
He married, and together he and his wife worked double shifts and saved like mad, until finally, they had a deposit for a home.
They, plus a couple of kids after a while, were doing okay.

The factory was quite profitable, but a consulting firm showed the owner how he could make even bigger profits by moving the operation to China.
And so he closed it down and took it offshore.
Several small businesses that supported the factory closed down right away.

Shayne, along with many others, were suddenly unemployed in a town with, equally suddenly, high unemployment. Eventually, he and his wife couldn’t meet their mortgage payments, so the bank foreclosed.

Now he was not only unemployed, but, along with his family, was homeless; he was what’s technically known as being seriously short of a buck.

But what’s this got to do with our PM, you ask.

Well, Morrison is an ardent follower of American style Wealth Theology. This preaches that if you’re poor it’s your own fault. You deserved it, so God made you poor.

So, according to Scott, Shayne deserved to be poor, otherwise he wouldn’t be in that sorry state.

On the other hand, Wealth Theology also teaches that the factory owner must have deserved to be rich and so God made him rich.

Well, I have two questions for Morrison.
What did Shayne do to deserve his situation? and
What did the factory owner do that made him so deserving of God’s largesse?

I’ll finish with a question for you, dear reader.

When you understand Morrison’s strongest beliefs, are you surprised that his govt:
> Cut penalty rates;
> Cut the NDIS;
> is giving huge tax cuts to the wealthiest among us?

No, me neither.



Leave a Comment

Humanity Has Been Here Before – And It Didn’t End Well

A couple of centuries ago, on what was probably an otherwise unremarkable day, a member of the Rapa Nui people cut down the last tree on Easter island.

I wonder what he thought as it came crashing to the ground. Perhaps, “Well, it’s the last one anyway, so what the hell?”

Did he wonder, fleetingly, if the word for tree would disappear from his people’s language? After all, of what use is a name for something that no longer exists.

Or maybe he thought, “It’ll be alright. Somebody will figure something out. We’ll be okay.”

But it wasn’t alright. And within a few generations, the island was unable to support a community.

What led me to think about this was an article about how the G7 Countries still subsidize the fossil fuel industry to the tune of $100 Billion a year. I wonder if those governments too are thinking, “It’ll be alright. Somebody will figure something out. We’ll be okay.”

Meanwhile, I wonder how many degrees those government ministers have between them. I’m guessing, quite a lot, and probably from prestigious universities.

And yet… and yet… they seem to be no smarter than that islander who cut down that last tree all those years ago.

It’s thought that the Rapa Nui people destroyed their forests to make logs to move the giant Easter Island heads into position, and to get them vertical. So, they were driven, we believe, by religious fervor.

I rather think the fossil fuel industry folk, and the governments that support them, are driven by the same motivation. But they worship no all-powerful being. Their gods are so much more banal.

Money.

And Power.

Meanwhile, I wonder what words our grandchildren, and their children, will no longer have a use for.

Leave a Comment

You Won’t Believe What Some Folks Believe

There was a time, only a few generations ago, when conspiracy theorists and believers in the ridiculous would mostly be found sitting in the corner of their local, mumbling into their beer.

Occasionally one of them would hit the jackpot and link up with a few fellow believers, in which case they would sit together in the corner taking it in turns to mumble into their beer.

And then, along came the internet and millions of the exceedingly gullible were suddenly able to share and build upon each other’s delusions.

The promised land opened before them, and lo, Peak Stupid was achieved.

A US pollster Yougov recently discovered that as many as a third of Americans believe the earth is flat despite several decades of observations and photos from space to the contrary. Post Game of Thrones, their model has expanded to include that the earth is not only flat but surrounded by a wall of ice.

Well of course it is.

Another respected pollster Public Policy Polling found that 4% of Americans believe that the world is secretly run by a group of shape shifting lizards. Why lizards? I have no idea, but a British ex sports broadcaster named David Icke has written a bestseller pushing the notion.

In direct opposition to the Lizard Theory supporters are those who assert that the Illuminati secretly run the world. The Illuminati are merely humans, so the Lizard believers definitely win on the creativity front.

Although, the Illuminati idea has been around since the 15th Century, so it, evidently, has legs.

Around 10% of Americans believe the Chemtrail Theory. This one holds that vapour trails left by aircraft are actually poisons being sprayed on us by our governments, for all manner of nefarious purposes, but mostly to keep us subjugated.

I’ve used American statistics because stats on how many Aussie believers this stuff is hard to come by, although judging by social media debates, I’d guess it’s a sizable number.

And – just a personal observation – I note that a large proportion of One Nation Supporters believe in one or several of these ideas.

Hmm!

Rather makes Global Warming Denialism seem tame by comparison, doesn’t it.

Leave a Comment

Of Tribes and Franking Dividends

In the last year or so, Tribalism has become a thing. Usually in reference to the Left/Right political divide.
But, the reality is, we have all, always, been tribal. And to further complicate matters, we all belong, simultaneously to many tribes, some more important than others.
This Tribalism is a slippery little sucker.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Tribalism.jpeg
Medium.com

There are, obviously, skin colour tribes, gender tribes and sexual orientation tribes. There are where we were educated tribes, which church we belong to tribes, and so on.
The tribes we belong to matter, to us and to others. They define what we choose to believe, what we wear and the stories we tell ourselves and others about who we are and what we stand for.
Which brings me to the Great Franked Dividend debate.
Here we have a group of people, mostly well to do, and mostly seniors, or at least folks knocking on the door of seniorhood. There are a couple of tribes right there.
But if we’d have spoken to these folk a month or two ago, and asked them which tribe was most important, I reckon, given their demographic, they’d have said that first and foremost, they were patriotic Australians.
If asked, they’d have likely talked with pride about Anzac Day, and our easy going ways and what a great and decent people we Aussies are.
Indeed, many of them would recognize,
“There was movement at the station,   
for the word had got around,
that the colt from old Regret had got away…”
Many would even say they’d sacrifice themselves for their country and speak with reverence about those who had.
And then along came the Franked Dividends issue.
These same folk were asked to give up a little of there-well-to-doness for the good of the country; so that more money would be available to do good for the nation, and for their fellow Australians.
And lo, a new tribe was born.
Suddenly their Aussieness was no longer their preeminent tribe.
This new tribe, one that didn’t even exist back at Christmas time, was suddenly so important to them that, as we saw, some were prepared to be violent towards their old Aussie tribe members;the tribe that used to matter so much.
We’re all like that, to varying degrees. Politicians know this.
They spend fortunes and countless days trying to convince to join this or that tribe.
As I said at the outcome, Tribes are slippery. They come and they go and they change their shape.
But here’s what doesn’t change: If you want to understand why we human critters do what we do, first figure out what tribes we have decided to join.

Leave a Comment

Partly Global Warming?

Last month I was in the US, where I learned that in California the reality of Human Induced Global warming is pretty much a given, but in the rest of the country there’s still a fairly brutal debate going on.

And in the UK, there’s still a fair bit of disagreement.

Here in Oz, we’re finally starting to reach agreement, although Sky News isn’t giving up without a fight.

But in Europe, at least the western part, there’s virtually 100% acceptance of Global Warming and the need for urgent action.

Ditto in Asia and Africa.

So, we see the worst foot dragging and the most resistance to the notion that we are making the planet hotter, in the US, Australia and the UK.

Now, these are also the societies where the Murdoch Press is most active.

Coincidence? I don’t think so.

Which leads me to ask, should Rupert Murdoch be tried for Crimes Against Humanity?
And if you think he should, then the next question is, how do we make that happen?

Leave a Comment

OBSERVATION POINT

Copyright Anthony Element 2019